|
|
Contract Dispute Claims
When contract disputes with a government customer obscure the path to success, our government contracts litigators know how to pursue resolution. We quickly assess the claim and present the dispute to the government when success is most likely to be achieved. Our attorneys are familiar with the complex web of government contract clauses, Federal Acquisition Regulations, and the remedies available under them. Williams Mullen’s Government Contracts Litigation and Investigations lawyers are experts in claims analysis; shaping entitlement theories; formulating methods of computing the amount of recovery; and presenting, defending and litigating the contract disputes. In this area, Williams Mullen attorneys demonstrate that “Every Client is a Partner.”
When contract disputes with a government customer obscure the path to success, our government contracts litigators know how to pursue resolution. We quickly assess the claim and present the dispute to the government when success is most likely to be achieved. Our attorneys are familiar with the complex web of government contract clauses, Federal Acquisition Regulations, and the remedies available under them. Williams Mullen’s Government Contracts Litigation and Investigations lawyers are experts in claims analysis; shaping entitlement theories; formulating methods of computing the amount of recovery; and presenting, defending and litigating the contract disputes. In this area, Williams Mullen attorneys demonstrate that “Every Client is a Partner.”
Williams Mullen attorneys pursue a thorough investigation of the facts and applicable law, with the support of client technical, contracts and accounting personnel. On behalf of our clients, we seek first to resolve disputes through the use of Requests for Equitable Adjustments and only when all administrative avenues are closed, will Williams Mullen attorneys file claims. We have brought numerous claims based on breach of contract, constructive and directed changes, contract terminations, delay and disruption, defective contract specifications, breach of the duty to cooperate, over inspection, defective government-furnished property, latent defects and government interference, various audit related claims, and many other contract grounds.
|