Mark Thomas is a partner in the firm’s Litigation Section. He represents individuals and businesses in connection with lawsuits involving intellectual property claims, ERISA and other employee benefits disputes, and other business-related disputes. In addition, he counsels clients on the administration of employee benefit plans.
Mark Thomas is a partner in the firm’s Litigation Section. He represents individuals and businesses in connection with lawsuits involving intellectual property claims, ERISA and other employee benefits disputes, and other business-related disputes. In addition, he counsels clients on the administration of employee benefit plans.
Mr. Thomas has over 20 years of experience in ERISA and other employee benefits litigation at the trial as well as appellate level. He has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in cases involving a wide range of plan types, including disability, health and severance plans and various forms of retirement plans. His experience includes defending plan administrators and other fiduciaries against claims of fiduciary breach and representing plan participants enforcing their rights to retirement and disability benefits.
For over 25 years, Mr. Thomas has also represented clients, both plaintiffs and defendants, in intellectual property litigation, including patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret claims, and he also regularly counsels clients with respect to trademark protection and registration. His litigation experience also includes cases involving complex business disputes.
Mr. Thomas is a founder and past president of the Triangle Benefits Forum, and a regular speaker on ERISA and other employee benefits law. He has been named a "Super Lawyer" by North Carolina Super Lawyers magazine and is listed in The Best Lawyers in America. Martindale Hubbell has rated Mr. Thomas an AV attorney, its highest rating available.
Mr. Thomas is licensed to practice in North Carolina. He is a member of the Intellectual Property Section and past chair of the Labor & Employment Law Section of the North Carolina Bar Association, as well as a member of the International Law & Practice Section Council. Mr. Thomas is a member of the Tort and Insurance Section American Bar Association, as well as the Intellectual Property Law Section. He is also a member of the American Intellectual Property Law Association, the Defense Research Institute and the North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys.
As vice-chair, Mr. Thomas is active in the History Committee of the Wake County Bar Association. He is also a member of the Board of Directors, and past president, for the Badger-Iredell Foundation, an organization established by the Wake County Bar Association to administer the historic collection of the Badger-Iredell law office in Mordecai Park of Raleigh, North Carolina.
A graduate of Wake Forest University and Wake Forest University School of Law, Mr. Thomas earned his bachelor of arts degree, magna cum laude, and his juris doctor degree, cum laude.
- Represented Plaintiff in federal lawsuit against a former consultant to our client. The lawsuit included claims of breach of contract, conveying trade secret technology and misappropriation of that technology, and attempted sale of it to a rival company. Case resolved through trial.
- Represented two docking pilots, who were participants in a union pension plan, in a suit against the union, its plan and plan fiduciaries. The plan refused to provide the promised level of pension benefits. After extensive discovery and motions practice, case settled under confidential terms.
- Represented a pesticide manufacturer in a case for declaratory judgment and false advertising claims under the Lanham Act arising from the Defendant's advertising that mischaracterized the qualities and effectiveness of our client's product formulation for termite control systems. The case settled under confidential terms.
- Served as local defense counsel in action alleging infringement of patents in genetically modified corn. Our work was largely focused on local motions practice and representation lasting from 1995 until 2006, when our client was acquired by another company and they consolidated their patent counsel. Ultimately, we transferred representation to another firm.
- Represented individual involved in a wrongful termination of employee benefits under ERISA case in federal court. Case was later appealed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
- Our client contracted to transfer rights of a patent to a vendor/supplier under terms for a schedule of payments and patent registration maintenance fees. The vendor/supplier failed to pay as contracted and then refused to transfer the patent back to our client as the contract required in those circumstances so Williams Mullen filed suit on behalf of our client. Case settled.
- Defended builder against claims brought by architect/designer alleging infringement of copyrighted house plans. After extensive discovery, case settled.
- Plaintiff was local jewelry designer, maker and retailer that sued Defendant for alleged infringement of Plaintiff's copyrighted silver jewelry designs and for related alleged Lanham Act violations. Case settled.
- Williams Mullen defended client against claims of alleged breach of a contract to promote a racing team in the NASCAR truck racing circuit, including negotiation of major sponsorships, and business torts. The case was removed to federal court, where our client subsequently filed counterclaims for failure by Plaintiff to pay for services rendered and loans advanced. Case negotiated to settlement.
- Williams Mullen defended the U.S. subsidiary of a European maker of computerized furniture-making equipment sued for alleged violations of the Lanham Act, libel and other claims. Case resolved and later appealed to Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.
- Williams Mullen defended a client in an arbitration arising from a dispute over a contract for licensing and implementation of an enterprise software system. Our client was involved in the implementation of the enterprise software system. The case was removed to federal court to obtain an order to enforce the arbitration clause in the contract. Williams Mullen conducted extensive discovery and defended the client in arbitration. The case settled, under confidential terms, shortly before the scheduled hearing.
- Defended former partners of plaintiff architectural firm, who did the preliminary work on design for large data processing center for a bank. At close of design phase, our clients left the architectural firm and established their own firm. The bank hired our clients to serve as architects of record and build the building. Plaintiff architectural firm sued our clients and the bank for copyright infringement and breach of conract. Case ultimately settled.
- Williams Mullen defended health care insurer for coverage of autologous bone marrow transplant under a plan sponsored through the Federal Employee Health Benefits Act (FEHBA). Judgment rendered and upheld by Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.
- Williams Mullen defended client against claims brought by a hospital that sued following the Plaintiff's treatment of client's employee, when benefits under client's medical plan were refused on the grounds of an exclusion for unlawful activity. The case ultimately settled.
- Defended a third-party in an products liability action brought by the North Carolina vendor of TV satellite dishes. The Plaintiff sued its Illinois-based supplier, which then sued our client for allegedly defective products. After conducting discovery, case settled.
- Williams Mullen defended a paper products manufacturer that was sued for severance benefits by four of its former management-level employees. Case litigated to summary judgment.
- Defended client against personal injury claims allegedly sustained by Plaintiff as she exited a mis-leveled elevator. The first trial was declared a mistrial due to a hung jury. The case was litigated a second time to verdict.
- Defended client company sued by home owner for allegedly defective product and negligent installation that caused a fire. Plaintiff accused client company's home space heater of defects leading to their home catching fire. After conducting extensive discovery, case settled.
- Defended insurance company in employee benefits dispute over coverage for a governmental employee benefits plan. Case settled.
- Defended distributor and two retailers sued for copyright and trademark infringement of intellectual property from the movie "Top Gun". Case settled.
- Williams Mullen defended our client company's benefits plan and plan administrator when the mother of a deceased employee of our client company sued for death benefits, disputing the son's final designation of his estranged wife as his beneficiary. All claims of case resolved through litigation except one, which was later settled.
- Defended a physician practice sued by a former non-doctor employee. Plaintiff brought claims against the employer, Plan Administrator and two retirement plans alleging the Plaintiff was entitled to several hundred thousand dollars more in contributions, and was entitled to recover $3M in civil penalties against the Plan Administrator for failure to provide copies of requested plan documents. Case was litigated in U.S. Federal Court in the Eastern District of North Carolina and then appealed to the Fourth Circuit.
-
04.16.2013
Court Dismisses ERISA Case Concerning Investments in Mortgage-Backed Securities
-
03.25.2013
The Second Circuit Finds a Crucial Limitation in the Moensch Presumption For Retirement Plan Fiduciaries
-
02.27.2013
Williams Mullen North Carolina Attorneys Named 2013 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
-
02.22.2013
Retirement Plan Plaintiffs Were Not Required To Exhaust Administrative Remedies Before Filing Their Class Action
-
01.23.2013
Fourth Circuit Holds That Plan Administrators' Alleged Fiduciary Breach Based on 401(k) Plans' Fund Selection Is Time-Barred
-
12.18.2012
The Emerging Frontiers for Equitable Remedies under ERISA in the Fourth Circuit: Moon v. BWX Technologies
-
11.20.2012
The strategic importance of ERISA preemption in wrongful termination cases: Swindler v. Ben Lippen School and Columbia International University
-
09.19.2012
Seventh Circuit Allows Retaliation Claim By Complaining Plan Participant
-
09.13.2012
104 Williams Mullen Attorneys Named 2013 Best Lawyers in America
-
08.20.2012
Sixth Circuit Case Highlights Potential Traps for Employee Health Care Benefits: Clarcor, Inc. v. Madison National Life Insurance Co., Inc.
-
07.11.2012
McCravy v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.: Recognizing A Broader Scope for ERISA’s Equitable Remedies
-
06.22.2012
Exhaustion of Plan Remedies Required For Benefits Claim: Woodard v. Fredericksburg Hospitalist Group, P.C.
-
05.21.2012
Eleventh Circuit Rules That Home Depot Plan Fiduciaries Did Not Breach Their Duties Related to the Plan’s Company Stock Fund: Lanfear v. Home Depot, Inc.
-
04.19.2012
Retirement Plans’ Fiduciaries Are Found Liable to Plans for $36.9 Million: Tussey v. ABB, Inc.
-
03.16.2012
Fiduciary Not Liable For Money Damages in Action to Recover Death Benefits: Stocks v. Life Insurance Company of North America
-
02.16.2012
Corporate Spin-Off and a New Retirement Plan Did Not Violate Employees’ Rights Under ERISA: Nauman v. Abbott Laboratories
-
01.23.2012
Williams Mullen Attorneys Named 2012 North Carolina “Super Lawyers”
-
01.18.2012
Fourth Circuit Upholds Plan Administrator's Interpretation to Deny Disabled Doctor's Benefits Claim
-
12.14.2011
Fourth Circuit Rules That Retirement Plan Trustees’ Failures Must Have Causal Link to Plan Losses In Order to Hold Trustees Liable: Plasterers’ Local Union No 96 Pension Plan v. Pepper, No. 10-1364 (4th Cir., December 1, 2011)
-
11.23.2011
Second Circuit Rules in Favor of Retirement Plan Administrators Where Plan Requires Investments in Company Stock
-
11.10.2011
Mark S. Thomas Featured in Inside Counsel Magazine Article
-
10.18.2011
Case Holds That ERISA Claims Based On Initial Investment Decisions Are Time-Barred
-
10.05.2011
Edgenet, Inc. v. The Home Depot USA, Inc., et al – Seventh Circuit Holds that Contract Gave Retailer the Right to Purchase a Perpetual Copyright License in Inventory Database Taxonomy and to Use that Taxonomy to Create Its Own Version
-
09.29.2011
Williams Mullen Attorneys Named 2012 Best Lawyers in America
-
09.20.2011
Plan Investment Decisions Are Protected in Loomis v. Exelon Corporation
-
08.16.2011
Second Circuit Holds that Retained Asset Accounts Are Not Plan Assets
-
07.19.2011
DOL Delays Fee Disclosure Effective Dates
-
07.19.2011
Court Requires Strict Adherence To Plan Amendment Provisions: Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. 1:02-CV-373 (M.D.N.C. June 1, 2011)
-
06.20.2011
Supreme Court Expands the Scope of Equitable Relief for Retirement Plan Plaintiffs
-
05.06.2011
ERISA Case Alert - May 2011: George v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.
-
04.08.2011
Court’s Remedial Power Under ERISA Includes Grant to the Substitute Fiduciary to Terminate Pension Plan Solis v. Clark Consulting v. Malkani, et al., No. 09-1383(L) (4th Cir. Mar. 16, 2011)
-
03.17.2011
Several Mistakes by the Claim Administrator Lead to an Award of Disability Benefits
-
02.15.2011
The Seventh Circuit clarifies the standards for class certification in ERISA cases
-
01.26.2011
Veera v. Ambac Plan Administrative Committee, et al. “Stock Drop” Case Proceeds in Federal Court
-
12.07.2010
Absence of Non-Forfeiture Provisions in “Top Hat” Plans Permitted Employer to Withhold Benefits Accrued During Participant's Wrongdoing
-
11.17.2010
Spouse’s Decision to Retire Does Not Support Participant’s Fiduciary Breach Claim Against His Own Retirement Plan
-
10.21.2010
ERISA Fiduciary Duties Do Not Apply to Employer Under a Non-ERISA Stock and Incentive Plan
-
09.13.2010
Recent Case Holds That ERISA Plan Fiduciaries Cannot Seek Reimbursement from the Contingency Fee Award to the Participant's Attorney
-
08.06.2010
Ninety-Eight Williams Mullen Attorneys Named "Best Lawyers in America" 2011
-
01.28.2010
Fifteen Williams Mullen Attorneys Named 2010 North Carolina “Super Lawyers” or “Rising Stars”
-
07.30.2009
Eighty-five Attorneys Named "Best Lawyers in America" 2010
-
12.12.2008
New Battleground for ERISA Fiduciaries: Liability for 401(k) Plan “Excessive Fees”
-
09.17.2008
Eighty-one Attorneys Named "Best Lawyers in America 2009"
-
04.26.2013
2013 Raleigh Fiduciary Focus
-
03.07.2013
Affordable Care Act Implications for Employers
-
09.20.2012
New Realities of the Affordable Care Act and the Retirement Plan Participant Fee Disclosures
-
03.27.2012
Selected Issues in ERISA Litigation
-
03.08.2012
Successfully Navigating a Year of Changes in Employee Benefits
-
06.03.2011
ERISA Fundamentals
-
04.26.2011
Selected Issues in ERISA Litigation
-
03.31.2011
The North Carolina Bar Association presents The Practice of International Law In North Carolina
-
11.15.2010
ERISA for Master's of Law Students - Wake Forest
-
04.27.2010
Selected Issues in ERISA Litigation: A Case Law Update
-
04.18.2010
International Law Panel
-
11.13.2009
ERISA for Master's of Law Students - Wake Forest
-
10.19.2009
Analyzing Plan Remedies and the Scope of Equitable Remedies, to Achieve Realistic Settlement Expectations
-
07.23.2009
Intellectual Property: Building Your Castle Moat
-
04.28.2009
Supreme Court Decisions Affecting ERISA Plans And Fiduciaries
-
11.13.2008
ERISA for Master's of Law Students - Wake Forest
-
10.26.2007
ERISA for Master's of Law Students - Wake Forest
-
10.26.2007
ERISA for Master's of Law Students - Wake Forest
-
02.03.2007
ERISA Litigation - Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Perspectives